Waiting reply to suggestion by Vinay Dadmal

• Token ID: Dept/IELE/2016/1079
• Department : Energy
• Status: Closed
• Date: 27/06/2016

Plus-Minus

Your Grievance:

MY CONSUMER NO.458010119053 BILLING UNIT;2178 WARORA MOBILE NO:9822223915 EMAIL;dadmalv@hotmail.com MY ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR LAST COMPLETED YEAR 2015 FROM JAN 2015 TO DEC 2015 IS RS 18000/-IN AMOUNT TERM.THIS MEANS ON AN AVERAGE I HAVE TO PAY RS 1500/- PER MONTH.ALLOW THE CUSTOMER TO PAY RS 1500/- PER MONTH IN YEAR 2016 WITHOUT SENDING ANY BILL.NOTE METER READING ON 31/12/2016 AND CALCULATE MONTHLY CONSUMPTION AND IF IT COMES OUT SAY RS 1600/- PER MONTH THEN INCREASE NEXT AVERAGE MONTHLY BILL FOR 2017.IF WE USE THIS METHOD THEN NO NEED TO RECORD MONTHLY METER READIND AND PRINTING BILL.THIS WILL REDUCE EXPENDITURE AND REDUCE CONSUMPTION COMPLAINTS AND GIVE CONSUMERS BENEFIT PARTICULARLY VILLAGERS .THIS IDEA IS IPR PROTECTED FOR USE. Vinay Dadmal, vinay dadmal innovations, Dr Radhakrushnan colony, warora,india,442907 ABOVE SUGGESTION WAS GIVEN TO MSEDCL TO ALL MD,CE,SE,EE OF MSEDCL BUT NOT A SINGLE REPLY RECEIVED WHICH SHOWS RIGIDITY IN THEIR STANCE ,NOW I HOPE THE DECISION SHOULD CUM FROM THE MINISTRY SO THAT EXPENDITURE CAN BE SAVED AND CONSUMER GET THE MAXIMUM BENEFITS. 

Comment By Energy ( July 8, 2016 4:04 PM ) : प्रिय नागरिक,

महाराष्ट्र शासनाशी संपर्क साधल्याबद्दल आभार.
आपला दिनांक 27.06.2016 रोजीचा अर्ज आवश्यक त्या कार्यवाहीसाठी क्र. आसपो-2016/प्र.क्र.182/ऊर्जा-2 दिनांक 05.07.2016 अन्वये महावितरण कंपनी यांच्याकडे पाठविण्यात आला असून त्याबाबत कंपनीकडून आपणास कळविण्यात येईल.
हा प्रयास यशस्वी करण्यासाठी महाराष्ट्र राज्याच्या नागरिकांकडून सक्रिय योगदान आणि सहकार्य अपेक्षित आहे. 

सदिच्छा,
तक्रार निवारण सहाय्य पथक  

Find solution if you can

• Token ID: Dept/REVD/2017/5165
• Department : Revenue
• Status: In Progress
• Date: 04/09/2017

Plus-Minus

Your Grievance:

My grievance is how for the following the state government will help the sufferers. 1.In India a agriculture land owner record is maintained on 7/12 form.If land owner is male then if he dies then the record on 7/12 changes and his wife’s name with their children’s name replaces the dead persons name.If land owner is female then if she dies then the record on 7/12 changes and her children’s name replaces the dead woman’s name though her husband is alive his name not get mentioned on 7/12.Why husband not get dead wife’s property when children are there ? 2.In Maharashtra if government servant of class III or class IV dies then there will be a job offered to the survived husband /wife.My neighbour lady lost her government servant husband when she was 39 year old.She registered her name for the job on compensation.There was no communication from government about when she get job till when she turned 45 then she received letter from the government that as she crossed 45 age she was not liable for any government job. How the lady can be helped ?She has one adopted girl child of 16 year old.Do you think it’s lady’s fault which deprived her from getting job ? 

Dissatisfying reply to grievance

• Token ID: Dept/SESD/2016/2011
• Department : School Education and Sports
• Status: Closed
• Date: 31/07/2016

Plus-Minus

Your Grievance:

Soon for 5 & 8 stud scholarship exam will be conducted.If we examine the data then we found that the actual scholarship amount awarded is ten fold less than the amount spend by the students on transportation while appearing for this exam.Now can we select students with different way.If we pick all toppers from all schools of 5 & 8 standard then by preparing merit list we get the desired students .My grievance is we are not using computer data properly to perfection 

Comment By School Education and Sports ( August 2, 2016 4:33 PM ) : Dear Citizen, 

Thank you for contacting Government of Maharashtra and providing your valuable suggestion. 

The Aaple Sarkar portal has a MyGov section where you can provide your suggestions on a variety of topics of importance to the state and it's citizens.
We request you to post your suggestion in the relevant topic forum. https://maharashtra.mygov.in/ 

Thank you again for your interest in building a prosperous Maharashtra. 

Regards,
Grievance Redressal Support Team


Comment By dadmalv (Citizen user) ( October 6, 2016 1:53 PM ) : PLEASE FORWARD THESE SUGGESTIONS TO PROPER DEPARTMENTS. 

Dissatisfaction Reason: Incomplete resolution 

Waiting reply to suggeston

• Token ID: Dept/RDDE/2016/2241
• Department : Home-Transport & Ports
• Status: Closed
• Date: 20/12/2016

Plus-Minus

Your Grievance:

Following suggestion was given one month ago to the ministry but no reply yet received The buses of the state transport service ply buses from taluka place to rural places should carry no conductor.There should be no fare to come from villages to taluka place but there will be 25% higher fare for going to villages from taluka place which will be collected by bus driver.The bus should Be remodelled in such a way that front half will carry sitting passengers and rare half will be used to carry sell able perishable goods.The passenger can be allowed to carry his cycle.No current bus timings will be changed or stopped 

Comment By Home-Transport & Ports ( January 8, 2017 12:18 PM ) : Sir
Sorry for the inconvenience caused to you and the passengers of your area.. Your complaint has been forwarded to the General Manager (Traffic) Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, VahatukBhavan, Mumbai Central, Mumbai 400 008 for immediate necessary action. You can also send your complaint / suggestions on their email ID gmtraffic@msrtc.gov.in or tollfree no. 1800221250

Regards
Grievance Redressal Support Team -Transport


Comment By dadmalv (Citizen user) ( January 11, 2017 5:00 AM ) : There is routine reply and no specific solution.please do not close grievance till reply comes from gm. 

Dissatisfaction Reason: Incomplete resolution 

Unresolved grievance in Maharashtra

• Token ID: Dept/FIND/2017/1371
• Department : Finance
• Status: Closed
• Date: 31/03/2017

Plus-Minus

Your Grievance:

I ALREADY RECEIVED REPLY TO MY EARLIER GRIEVANCE TOKEN NO Dept/GADS/2017/1566 DATED 04/01/2017 WHICH IS HIGHLY IRRITATING AS WHAT IS WRITTEN IN THE SUGGESTION IS TOTALLY IGNORED.I WANT THE PERSONS GETTING DOUBLE PENSION OR SALARY WITH FAMILY PENSION SHOULD BE DEPRIVED FROM GETTING FAMILY PENSION AND SUCH FAMILY PENSION BE DISTRIBUTED AMONG DESEASED'S FAMILY MEMBERS NOT GETTING ANY SALARY OR PENSION. 

Comment By Finance ( April 27, 2017 11:14 AM ) : प्रिय नागरिक,
उक्त तक्रारी संदर्भात आपणांस कळविण्यात येते की, आपण दि.04.01.2017 च्या अर्जान्वये महाराष्ट्र शासनाच्या राज्य शासकीय कर्मचाऱ्यांच्या निवृत्तीवेतन नियमामध्ये बदल करण्याची विनंती आपले सरकार पोर्टलव्दारे केली होती. सदर नियमामध्ये आपण सांगितल्याप्रमाणे बदल करण्याची विनंती मान्यता करता येणार नाही, असे शासनाच्या दि.30.01.2017 च्या पत्रान्वये आपणांस कळविण्यात आले आहे. सदर उत्तर कायम असून या उत्तरामध्ये कोणताही बदल करण्यात येत नाही.
महाराष्ट्र शासनाशी संपर्क साधल्याबद्दल आभार.

हा प्रयास यशस्वी करण्यासाठी महाराष्ट्र राज्याच्या नागरिकांकडून सक्रिय योगदान आणि सहकार्य अपेक्षित आहे. 

सदिच्छा,
तक्रार निवारण सहाय्य पथक 

Drafting grievance in Maharashtra

• Token ID: Dept/GADD/2017/723
• Department : GAD-Organization & Methods (O&M)
• Status: Closed
• Date: 16/07/2017
• 

Plus-Minus

Your Grievance:

I received two letters from State government Officers and I want to lodge this grievance about the quality of drafting these letters.Both letters attached. 1.Letter no.washi/ma.a./bandh/2017/1002/424 Nagar Parishad Office,Warora Dist.Chandrapur Date:12 July 2017 Twelve page letter sent by registered post under Right to Information Act 2005.My RTI requests clubbed together and without giving details of Second appeallate authority reply sent by Chief officer and first appeallate authority,Nagar Parishad ,Warora.They sent me 12 zerox copies but not asked me to pay for the same under RTI.At the bottom signature of CO is there but without the officers name underneath. 2.Letter no. prastu-1/2017/409 Office of the Tahasildar and Executive Magistrate,Chimur,Dist:Chandrapur Date:11 July 2017 Letter sent on my email address with my name and address written as Ra.:Shankarpur Tg : Chimur .In my grievance registered on portal Aple Sarkar nowhere I mentioned such address and I am not a resident of Shankarpur.The letter was sent in reply to my grievance.In the reply Tahasildar informed that as per Land Revenue Act 1966 under column 149 I have to submit land mutation application to Talathi with Warsan certificate and in proper proforma.At the end the signature was there without name of the officer. In both these letters the Acts mentioned but what is the intention of the Act is not used at all .The spirit with which the Acts were drafted is missing.The officers without mentioning their names signing the documents is very serious thing. Please provide necessary guidelines about letter drafting and training to the staff concerned.This is not complaint against any individual officer. 

Comment By GAD-Organization & Methods (O&M) ( July 25, 2017 6:09 PM ) : Thanking for contacting.
Instruction will be given to the officer.

Grievance sent to CM Maharashtra by VINAY DADMAL

• Token ID: Dept/GADO/2017/1245
• Department : Home-Police
• Status: In Progress
• Date: 24/08/2017

Plus-Minus

Your Grievance:

At present the frauds investigation methods used are taking lot much time and my grievance is we are not using innovative methos of working .To get justice we must limit the time taken by SIT or any other investigation agency otherwise the purpose of justice will be lost. For Example 1.Scholarship Fraud of Rs 7000/-Crore in Maharashtra:-The Maharashtra state government formed Special investigation team to investigate the fraud.The total process as per their present way will take at least 5 years.Instead the SIT must give amnesty to fraudsters that within 15 days those who received scholarship money fraudulently must come forward and meet SIT with the amount they received,the amnesty will be such persons will be financially penalized and no other action will be initiated. 2.Maitrey non banking company fraud in Maharashtra :-The total assets of the directors of the company must be allowed to be declared by the directors of the company.Then start investigation so that the duped persons will get some amount as quickly as possible.At present police investigation will take 10 years and the purpose of justice will be lost.