Alternate safe way to Conduct NEET UG 2027

From:
Vinay Dadmal
Age: 55 years
First Floor, Swarajnagar
Manewada Ring Road
Nagpur – 440027

To:
Hon’ble Prime Minister of India
Government of India
New Delhi

&

Hon’ble Chief Minister of Maharashtra
Government of Maharashtra
Mumbai

---

Subject: Suggestion for reform in NEET-UG and MBBS admission process

---

Respected Sir,

I am writing this letter as a concerned parent from Nagpur, Maharashtra, to place before you a constructive suggestion regarding the current NEET-UG examination and MBBS admission system in India.

In recent years, repeated issues related to national-level entrance examinations have caused stress and uncertainty among students and parents. Keeping in mind the welfare of students and the need for a fair and transparent system, I would like to humbly propose the following reform:

---

 Proposed Suggestion

1. Limited role of national entrance test (NTA):

   • The national-level examination (NEET or similar test) should be conducted only for:
     • 100% admissions in AIIMS and other central institutions
     • 15% All India Quota (AIQ) MBBS seats

2. State-level admission system (85% quota):

   • The remaining 85% MBBS seats in state government medical colleges should be filled based on:
     • A combined merit list of SSC (Class 10) and HSC (Class 12) marks

---

 Reasoning Behind the Proposal

• Reduces dependence on a single high-pressure entrance exam
• Encourages long-term academic consistency instead of one-day performance
• Minimizes mental stress and financial burden on students and families
• Reduces excessive reliance on coaching institutes
• Helps prevent risks of paper leaks and exam-related irregularities
• Provides a simpler and more equitable admission process

---

 Humble Request

I sincerely request the Hon’ble Prime Minister and Hon’ble Chief Minister to kindly consider this suggestion and initiate discussions or expert committee evaluation to explore its feasibility.

Your leadership and commitment to improving the education system are highly respected, and such reforms can greatly benefit the future of millions of students.

---

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,
Vinay Dadmal
Nagpur, Maharashtra DT :10.08.2026

 

IN MAHARASHTRA CONDUCT MH-CET for science students this way please

 

Proposal to the Hon'ble Chief Minister of Maharashtra

For Introduction of a Unified MH-CET 2027 Examination and Single Merit-Based Admission System for All Science Students

Submitted By:
Shri Vinay Dadmal
House No. 55, Swarajnagar,
Manewada Ring Road, Behind Omkarnagar,
Nagpur – 440027

Place: Nagpur
Date: 10 August 2026

---

To,

The Hon'ble Chief Minister of Maharashtra
Government of Maharashtra
Mantralaya, Mumbai

Subject: Proposal for Conducting a Unified MH-CET 2027 Examination for PCM, PCB and PCMB Students with a Single Combined Merit List for Admissions to Professional Courses

Respected Sir,

I respectfully submit this proposal for consideration by the Government of Maharashtra regarding an innovative reform in the Maharashtra Common Entrance Test (MH-CET) from the academic year 2027 onwards.

The proposed reform aims to establish a common examination platform for all Science stream students, simplify the admission process, promote multidisciplinary learning, ensure merit-based admissions, reduce student stress, and improve seat utilization in professional education institutions across Maharashtra.

---

1. Need for Reform

At present, Science students are divided into PCM (Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics), PCB (Physics, Chemistry, Biology), and PCMB (Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics and Biology) streams. Admission processes are generally influenced by stream-specific eligibility conditions and separate merit considerations.

As education is becoming increasingly multidisciplinary, there is a need to replace rigid stream-based divisions with a fair and transparent system that rewards overall academic performance and provides equal opportunities to all students.

A unified MH-CET examination can create a common competitive platform and simplify the higher education admission process for lakhs of students in Maharashtra.

---

2. Proposed Examination Structure

A single Computer-Based Test (CBT) shall be conducted for all Science stream students.

Subject-wise Marks Distribution

Subject	Marks
Physics	50
Chemistry	50
Mathematics	50
Biology	50
Total	200 Marks

Examination Features

1. One common examination for PCM, PCB and PCMB students.
2. Computer-Based Test (CBT) mode.
3. Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) format.
4. Equal weightage of all four subjects.
5. No negative marking.
6. Every student shall be free to attempt all questions.
7. Final score shall be calculated out of 200 marks.
8. A single result and common merit list shall be prepared.

---

3. Proposed Admission Framework

Admissions to professional courses shall be granted strictly on the basis of the candidate's position in the common merit list prepared from the unified examination.

Key Principles

1. All students shall compete in a single examination.
2. Every student shall have the opportunity to attempt questions from Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics and Biology.
3. No negative marking will provide every candidate an equal chance to maximize his or her score.
4. A single statewide merit list shall be prepared based on total marks obtained out of 200.
5. No separate PCM, PCB or PCMB merit lists shall be maintained.
6. Course and college allotment shall be based on:
   • Merit Rank
   • Reservation Policy
   • Candidate Preferences
   • Availability of Seats

Merit-Based Admission

Students securing higher overall scores shall receive higher preference during counselling and admissions, irrespective of the stream from which they have appeared.

This system rewards overall academic ability rather than stream categorization and provides equal opportunity to every Science student.

---

4. Feasibility Report

A. Academic Feasibility

Advantages

• Encourages learning across all major science subjects.
• Creates a multidisciplinary approach to education.
• Rewards broad scientific aptitude.
• Ensures equal competition among students.
• Supports flexibility in future career choices.

Assessment

The proposed examination structure is academically feasible because all four subjects are already part of the secondary and higher secondary science curriculum.

Feasibility Rating: High

---

B. Administrative Feasibility

Advantages

• Single examination system.
• Simplified administration.
• Reduced duplication of processes.
• Faster result declaration.
• Efficient centralized counselling.

Assessment

The State CET Cell already possesses extensive Computer-Based Testing infrastructure, making implementation practical and convenient.

Feasibility Rating: High

---

C. Financial Feasibility

Advantages

• Better utilization of existing examination infrastructure.
• Reduced administrative expenditure.
• Lower operational costs.
• Simplified counselling and admission process.

Assessment

The proposal is financially viable and can improve the efficiency of public expenditure on entrance examinations.

Feasibility Rating: High

---

D. Student Welfare Feasibility

Benefits

• Reduction in examination stress.
• Greater flexibility in career planning.
• Equal opportunity for all Science students.
• Transparent admission process.
• Merit-based competition.
• Reduction of complexity in higher education admissions.

Assessment

The proposal substantially benefits students and parents by creating a simple and fair admission mechanism.

Feasibility Rating: Very High

---

5. Additional Benefit: Better Utilization of Engineering Seats

One of the major advantages of the proposed unified merit system is the reduction of vacant engineering seats.

Under the present system, many engineering seats remain unfilled in various institutions due to stream-specific restrictions and fragmented admission processes.

Under the proposed MH-CET 2027 model:

• All Science students will be part of a common merit pool.
• Students will have access to a wider range of course options.
• More candidates will become eligible to participate in counselling for available seats.
• Institutions will be able to fill a larger number of sanctioned seats.
• The number of vacant seats in engineering colleges can be significantly reduced.
• Educational infrastructure created by the Government and private institutions will be utilized more efficiently.

This will benefit students, educational institutions and the State alike.

---

6. Merit Ranking and Seat Allocation Process

Stage 1: Common Examination

All Science students shall appear for a single MH-CET examination carrying 200 marks.

Stage 2: Preparation of State Merit List

A common merit list shall be prepared based solely on the total marks scored out of 200.

Stage 3: Online Counselling

Candidates shall submit preferences for colleges and courses through a centralized admission process.

Stage 4: Seat Allotment

Seats shall be allotted strictly on the basis of:

1. Combined Merit Rank
2. Applicable Reservation Policies
3. Candidate Preferences
4. Availability of Seats

No distinction shall be made between PCM, PCB and PCMB students while preparing the merit list.

---

7. Expected Benefits to Maharashtra

1. Creation of a unified and modern entrance examination system.
2. Simplification of admission procedures.
3. Promotion of multidisciplinary learning.
4. Equal opportunity for all Science students.
5. Greater transparency in admissions.
6. Merit-based allocation of educational opportunities.
7. Reduction in examination-related stress.
8. Better utilization of educational infrastructure.
9. Significant reduction in vacant engineering seats.
10. Improved efficiency of centralized counselling.
11. Alignment with the objectives of educational reforms and future-ready learning systems.

---

Prayer

In view of the academic, administrative, financial and student welfare benefits described above, I humbly request the Government of Maharashtra to constitute an Expert Committee to study the feasibility of introducing a Unified MH-CET 2027 Examination with a Single Combined Merit List for PCM, PCB and PCMB students and to consider its implementation in the larger interest of students across Maharashtra.

I sincerely hope that this proposal will receive favourable consideration for the advancement of higher education in the State.

Yours Faithfully,

(Vinay Dadmal)
House No. 55, Swarajnagar,
Manewada Ring Road, Behind Omkarnagar,
Nagpur – 440027

Place: Nagpur
Date: 10 August 2026

For RURAL development in INDIA reform in CEO ZP working needed Vinay Dadmal

 मा. मुख्य कार्यकारी अधिकारी,

सर्व जिल्हा परिषद./PANCHAYAT in INDIA

महोदय/महोदया,

जिल्हा परिषदेअंतर्गत कार्यरत कार्यालये, संस्था आणि विभागांमध्ये कार्यक्षमता, उत्तरदायित्व, पारदर्शकता तसेच नागरिकाभिमुख सेवा वितरण अधिक प्रभावी करण्यासाठी खालील प्रस्ताव आपल्या विचारार्थ सादर करीत आहे.

प्रस्ताव

प्रत्येक मुख्य कार्यकारी अधिकारी, जिल्हा परिषद (CEO) यांनी दर महिन्याला किमान एक आकस्मिक (Surprise) तपासणी जिल्हा परिषदेच्या प्रशासकीय नियंत्रणाखालील कोणत्याही कार्यालय, पंचायत समिती, प्राथमिक शाळा, आरोग्य केंद्र, उपकेंद्र, ग्रामीण पाणीपुरवठा कार्यालय, बांधकाम विभाग, कृषी विभाग किंवा इतर कोणत्याही जिल्हा परिषद संस्थेची करावी.

तपासणीनंतर मुख्य कार्यकारी अधिकाऱ्यांनी सविस्तर तपासणी अहवाल (Inspection Report) तयार करावा. या अहवालामध्ये पुढील बाबींचा समावेश असावा:

1. अधिकारी व कर्मचाऱ्यांची उपस्थिती आणि वक्तशीरपणा.
2. नागरिकांच्या तक्रारींच्या निवारणाची स्थिती.
3. सेवा वितरणाची गुणवत्ता व वेळबद्धता.
4. अभिलेख व फाईल व्यवस्थापनाची स्थिती.
5. कार्यालयाची स्वच्छता व पायाभूत सुविधा.
6. शासन नियम, आदेश व निर्देशांचे पालन.
7. आढळलेल्या त्रुटी व अनियमितता.
8. निदर्शनास आलेल्या उत्कृष्ट कार्यपद्धती व नाविन्यपूर्ण उपक्रम.
9. सुचविण्यात आलेल्या सुधारात्मक उपाययोजना.
10. कालमर्यादित कृती मुद्दे व संबंधित अधिकाऱ्यांची जबाबदारी निश्चिती.

सदर तपासणी अहवाल जिल्हा परिषदेअंतर्गत सर्व विभाग, पंचायत समित्या व संबंधित कार्यालयांना प्रसारित करण्यात यावा तसेच अंतर्गत डिजिटल प्रणालीवर उपलब्ध करून द्यावा.

व्यवहार्यता अहवाल (Feasibility Report)

प्रशासकीय व्यवहार्यता

• मुख्य कार्यकारी अधिकारी नियमितपणे क्षेत्रभेटी व आढावा बैठका घेत असतात.
• त्यामुळे दरमहा किमान एक आकस्मिक तपासणी करणे सहज शक्य आहे.
• राज्य शासन किंवा ग्रामविकास विभागाकडून एकसमान तपासणी अहवालाचा नमुना निश्चित करता येईल.

आर्थिक व्यवहार्यता

• प्रस्तावासाठी अतिरिक्त खर्च अत्यल्प असेल.
• विद्यमान मनुष्यबळ, वाहने व प्रशासकीय संसाधनांचा वापर करता येईल.
• अहवाल ई-मेल व इतर डिजिटल माध्यमांद्वारे प्रसारित करता येतील.

अपेक्षित लाभ

1. उत्तरदायित्वात वाढ

नियमित तपासण्यांमुळे अधिकारी व कर्मचारी यांच्यात शिस्त व कार्यक्षमता वाढेल.

2. प्रशासनात सुधारणा

एका कार्यालयातील त्रुटींची माहिती इतर कार्यालयांना उपलब्ध झाल्याने त्यांची पुनरावृत्ती टाळता येईल.

3. उत्कृष्ट कार्यपद्धतींचा प्रसार

यशस्वी उपक्रम व नाविन्यपूर्ण पद्धती इतर विभागांमध्येही राबविता येतील.

4. नागरिक सेवा वितरणात सुधारणा

सततच्या देखरेखीमुळे कामातील विलंब कमी होईल आणि नागरिकांचे समाधान वाढेल.

5. पारदर्शकता व संस्थात्मक शिक्षण

विभागांना परस्परांच्या अनुभवांमधून शिकण्याची संधी मिळेल.

6. त्वरित सुधारात्मक कार्यवाही

कालबद्ध अनुपालनामुळे त्रुटींचे जलद निराकरण होईल.

शिफारस

राज्य शासनाने सर्व जिल्हा परिषदांच्या मुख्य कार्यकारी अधिकाऱ्यांना (CEO) दरमहा किमान एक आकस्मिक तपासणी करण्याबाबत तसेच त्या तपासणीचा अहवाल सुधारात्मक शिफारशींसह सर्व संबंधित कार्यालयांना प्रसारित करण्याबाबत आवश्यक निर्देश जारी करण्याचा विचार करावा.

अशा प्रकारच्या सुधारणेमुळे जिल्हा परिषद प्रशासन अधिक कार्यक्षम, उत्तरदायी, पारदर्शक आणि नागरिकाभिमुख होण्यास मोठी मदत होईल.

धन्यवाद.

आपला विश्वासू,
विनय DADMAL
ई-मेल: dadmalv2015@gmail.com

दिनांक:10.08.2026

पत्ता:
55, स्वराजनगर,
ओंकारनगर मागे,
MANEवाडा रिंग रोड,
नागपूर - 440027.

REPLACE NEET UG in INDIA by UNSHET test from 2027 Vinay Dadmal way

 Proposal for Introduction of a Unified

National Science and Health Entrance

Test (UNSHET)

To

The Hon'ble Prime Minister of India

Government of India

South Block, Raisina Hill

New Delhi – 110011

Subject: Proposal for introducing a Unified National

Science and Health Entrance Test (UNSHET) by

replacing NEET-UG and JEE Main with a single

national entrance examination and common merit

list

Respected Hon'ble Prime Minister,

I respectfully submit this proposal for consideration by the Government of India to establish a

Unified National Science and Health Entrance Test (UNSHET) as a single national entrance

examination for admission to undergraduate medical, engineering, science, agriculture, and allied

professional courses across the country.

The objective of this proposal is to promote educational equality, reduce examination burden on

students, simplify the admission process, encourage multidisciplinary scientific learning, and

establish a transparent national merit-based system for all science students.

Background

At present, science students are required to appear for multiple national-level entrance

examinations such as:

• NEET-UG for medical and allied health courses.

• JEE Main for engineering and technology courses.

• Various state-level and institution-specific entrance examinations.

This multi-examination framework creates several challenges:

• Increased academic pressure and stress.

• Financial burden on students and families.

• Dependence on expensive coaching systems.

• Duplication of testing infrastructure and administrative expenditure.

• Artificial division between Mathematics and Biology streams at the Higher Secondary

level.

The successful implementation of NEET-UG has demonstrated the effectiveness of a national

unified entrance examination. Building upon this model, a common entrance examination for all

science disciplines can further strengthen India's higher education system.

Proposal

Establishment of UNSHET

The Government of India may establish the Unified National Science and Health Entrance Test

(UNSHET) under the National Testing Agency (NTA) through suitable amendments in relevant

laws, regulations, and admission frameworks administered by:

• Ministry of Education

• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

• National Medical Commission (NMC)

• AICTE

• UGC

• Other relevant statutory bodies

The proposed examination shall replace:

• NEET-UG

• JEE Main

and function as the sole national entrance examination for admissions to undergraduate science-

related professional and academic programmes.

Eligibility

The examination shall be open to:

• All candidates who have passed Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC)/Class XII or

equivalent examination from a recognized board.

• Students from CBSE, CISCE, State Boards, NIOS, and equivalent institutions.

• Candidates irrespective of the year of passing, subject to regulations prescribed for

specific courses by the Government of India and competent authorities.

Examination Pattern

The examination pattern shall remain identical to the present NEET-UG structure.

Subject Number of Questions

Physics 45

Chemistry 45

Mathematics 45

Biology 45

Total 180

Marking Scheme

• Correct Answer: +4 Marks

• Incorrect Answer: -1 Mark

• Unattempted Question: 0 Marks

Maximum Marks

720 Marks

Mode of Examination

• Computer Based Test (CBT)

• Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs)

• Syllabus primarily based on NCERT Classes XI and XII

Common National Merit List

A single All India Merit List shall be prepared on the basis of the aggregate marks obtained in:

• Physics

• Chemistry

• Mathematics

• Biology

Merit Formula

UNSHET Score = Physics + Chemistry + Mathematics + Biology

Maximum Score: 720 Marks

There shall be:

• No separate PCM merit list.

• No separate PCB merit list.

• No separate PCMB merit list.

• No separate engineering rank list.

• No separate medical rank list.

Every student shall compete through one common national merit list irrespective of intended

career choice.

Admissions Through UNSHET

Admissions through the common merit list may be utilized for:

Medical and Health Sciences

• MBBS

• BDS

• BAMS

• BHMS

• BUMS

• BSMS

• Nursing

• Physiotherapy

• Veterinary Sciences

• Allied Health Sciences

• Other healthcare programmes

Engineering and Technology

• B.Tech

• B.E.

• Integrated Engineering Programmes

• Emerging Technology Programmes

Science and Research

• B.Sc.

• Integrated B.Sc.-M.Sc.

• Biotechnology

• Agriculture

• Environmental Sciences

• Data Science

• Basic Sciences

• Research-oriented Programmes

Expected Benefits

Educational Benefits

• Encourages comprehensive study of all major science subjects.

• Promotes multidisciplinary learning and innovation.

• Eliminates rigid division between Biology and Mathematics streams.

• Enhances career flexibility for students.

Benefits to Students

• One examination instead of multiple entrance tests.

• Reduced mental stress and examination burden.

• Lower application, travel, and coaching expenses.

• Equal opportunities for rural and urban students.

Administrative Benefits

• Better utilization of national testing infrastructure.

• Elimination of duplication in examination administration.

• Greater transparency and uniformity in admissions.

• Simplified counselling and seat allocation processes.

National Benefits

• Advances the vision of "One Nation, One Examination."

• Creates a common national benchmark for scientific aptitude.

• Promotes educational equity across all regions.

• Supports development of a highly skilled scientific workforce.

Request for Consideration

I humbly request the Government of India to constitute a High-Level Expert Committee

comprising representatives from:

• Ministry of Education

• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

• National Medical Commission

• AICTE

• UGC

• National Testing Agency

• IITs

• AIIMS

• IISERs

• State Governments

• Universities and Academic Experts

to study the feasibility of implementing the Unified National Science and Health Entrance Test

(UNSHET) and creating a single national merit-based admission system for all science-related

undergraduate programmes.

Such a reform would greatly simplify admissions, reduce student burden, improve transparency,

and foster multidisciplinary scientific education in India.

I sincerely request the Government of India to examine this proposal in the larger interest of

students and the nation's future.

Yours faithfully,

Shri Vinay Dadmal

House No. 55, Swarajnagar

Behind Omkarnagar

Mahewada Ring Road

Nagpur – 440027

Maharashtra, India

Place: Nagpur

Date: 10.08.2025

Email: dadmalv2015@gmail.com

Annexure-I: Feasibility Report

Executive Summary

This proposal recommends the introduction of a Unified National Science and Health Entrance

Test (UNSHET) to replace NEET-UG and JEE Main with a single examination and a common All

India Merit List for admissions to science, engineering, medical, agriculture, and allied

professional programmes.

Technical Feasibility

Assessment: High

India already possesses:

• National Testing Agency (NTA) infrastructure.

• Nationwide CBT examination centres.

• Digital registration and evaluation systems.

• Experience in conducting large-scale national examinations.

Accordingly, implementation can be achieved with minimal additional infrastructure.

Academic Feasibility

Assessment: High

The proposed examination evaluates the four core science subjects:

• Physics

• Chemistry

• Mathematics

• Biology

Together, these subjects comprehensively assess scientific aptitude, analytical reasoning,

problem-solving ability, and conceptual understanding.

Administrative Feasibility

Assessment: Moderate to High

Implementation would require:

• Regulatory and legislative amendments.

• Coordination between educational and health-sector regulators.

• Development of a common counselling framework.

Given existing institutional structures, implementation is achievable through a phased approach.

Economic Feasibility

Assessment: High

Expected benefits include:

• Reduction in expenditure on multiple examinations.

• Lower costs for students and families.

• Improved efficiency in public spending.

• Better utilization of testing resources.

Social Impact

Positive Outcomes

• Reduced examination stress.

• Greater educational accessibility.

• Increased social and regional equity.

• Enhanced mobility across disciplines.

• Simplified admission system.

Challenges

• Transition management.

• Stakeholder consultations.

• Regulatory harmonization among institutions.

Suggested Implementation Roadmap

Phase I

• Formation of Expert Committee.

• National stakeholder consultations.

• Drafting of necessary amendments and regulations.

Phase II

• Pilot implementation.

• Evaluation of outcomes.

• Development of counselling framework.

Phase III

• Full-scale national implementation.

• Replacement of NEET-UG and JEE Main.

• Adoption of a single All India Merit List.

Conclusion

The proposed Unified National Science and Health Entrance Test (UNSHET) is administratively

practical, technologically feasible, academically sound, and economically beneficial. By

establishing a single entrance examination and a common national merit list, India can create a

more transparent, equitable, efficient, and student-centric admission system while advancing the

vision of integrated scientific education and national educational reform.

REFORM in ADMINISTRATIVE working by District Collectors/ District Magistrates/ CEO ZP in all 750 districts in INDIA

 

Subject: Reform in Administrative Working by District Collectors / District Magistrates/CEO ZP

Respected Sir/Madam,

I respectfully submit the following proposal for consideration to improve administrative efficiency, accountability, transparency, and public service delivery in government offices.

Proposal

It is proposed that every District Collector/District Magistrate (DM) should conduct at least one surprise inspection every month of any government office, institution, field office, school, health center, revenue office, municipal office, or any establishment functioning under the district administration.

Following the inspection, the District Collector should prepare a detailed Inspection Report covering:

1. Attendance and punctuality of officers and staff.
2. Status of public grievance redressal.
3. Quality and timeliness of citizen services.
4. Record maintenance and file management.
5. Office cleanliness and infrastructure.
6. Compliance with government rules and instructions.
7. Deficiencies and irregularities observed.
8. Good practices and innovative initiatives noticed.
9. Corrective measures recommended.
10. Time-bound action points and responsibility assignment.

The Inspection Report should be circulated to all offices under the district administration and uploaded on the district's internal communication platform for information and compliance.

Feasibility Report

Administrative Feasibility

• District Collectors already undertake field visits and inspections as part of their official duties.
• Therefore, conducting at least one surprise inspection every month will not require any major administrative restructuring.
• A standard reporting format can be prescribed by the State Government for uniform implementation.

Financial Feasibility

• The proposal involves negligible additional expenditure.
• Existing staff, infrastructure, vehicles, and communication systems can be utilized.
• Reports can be circulated digitally through official email systems.

Expected Benefits

1. Improved Accountability

Regular inspections will motivate officers and staff to maintain discipline, punctuality, and efficiency.

2. Better Governance

Deficiencies identified in one office can be corrected and prevented in other offices through circulation of inspection reports.

3. Sharing of Best Practices

Successful initiatives and innovative practices discovered during inspections can be replicated district-wide.

4. Improved Public Service Delivery

Continuous monitoring will help reduce delays and improve citizen satisfaction.

5. Transparency and Learning

All departments can learn from the observations, achievements, and shortcomings recorded in the reports.

6. Faster Corrective Action

Time-bound compliance monitoring will ensure that deficiencies are addressed promptly.

Recommendation

The State Government may consider issuing instructions to all District Collectors/District Magistrates to conduct at least one surprise inspection every month and circulate the inspection report along with action taken recommendations to all offices under their jurisdiction.

Such a reform would significantly strengthen administrative efficiency, accountability, transparency, and citizen-centric governance at the district level.

Thanking you.

Yours faithfully,

Vinay Dadmal
Email: dadmalv2015@gmail.com

Date: 10.08.2026

Address:
55, Swarajnagar,
Behind Omkarnagar,
Manewada Ring Road,
Nagpur - 440027.

Proposal for Self Declaration Affidavit Vinay Dadmal way

Proposal for Introducing Self-Declaration with Affidavit Facility

Submitted by:
Name: Vinay Dadmal
Address: 55, First Floor, Swarajnagar, Behind Omkarnagar, Manewada Ring Road, Nagpur – 440027
Email: dadmalv2015@gmail.com
Place: Nagpur
Date: 21.11.2025

---

Subject: Proposal to Introduce Self-Declaration with Affidavit Facility to Reduce Dependency on Officer Signatures

Respected Prime Minister of India and Chief Minister of Maharashtra,

Currently, citizens are required to chase officers for signatures and approvals for various official requirements, causing inconvenience and delays. To simplify this process and empower citizens, I propose introducing an additional facility: Self-Declaration with Affidavit.

Key Features of the Proposal:

1. Eligibility: Applicable for individuals aged 18 years and above.
2. Affidavit on Stamp Paper:
   • Age 18 to 25 years: Affidavit on ₹200 stamp paper.
   • Age 25 to 35 years: Affidavit on ₹500 stamp paper.
   • Age 35 years and above: Affidavit on ₹1000 stamp paper.
3. Purpose:
   • To allow individuals to self-certify their details for official requirements without needing officer signatures.
   • To reduce administrative burden and improve efficiency.
4. Legal Validity:
   • Affidavit will be legally binding and subject to penalties for false declarations.

This initiative will promote transparency, reduce corruption, and save time for both citizens and government officials.

I humbly request your kind consideration and approval for implementing this facility across India and Maharashtra.

Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
Vinay Dadmal

---

Draft in Marathi

स्वघोषणा व प्रतिज्ञापत्र सुविधा सुरू करण्याबाबत प्रस्ताव

प्रस्तावक:
नाव: श्री विनय दडमल
पत्ता: ५५, फर्स्ट फ्लोअर, स्वराजनगर, ओमकारनगर मागे, मानेवाडा रिंग रोड, नागपूर – ४४००२७
ई-मेल: dadmalv2015@gmail.com
ठिकाण: नागपूर
दिनांक: २१.११.२०२५

---

विषय: अधिकारी स्वाक्षरीसाठी होणारी धावपळ कमी करण्यासाठी स्वघोषणा व प्रतिज्ञापत्र सुविधा सुरू करण्याचा प्रस्ताव

मा. भारताचे पंतप्रधान व मा. महाराष्ट्राचे मुख्यमंत्री यांना,

सध्या नागरिकांना विविध शासकीय कामांसाठी अधिकाऱ्यांच्या स्वाक्षरीसाठी धावपळ करावी लागते, ज्यामुळे वेळ व श्रम वाया जातात. ही प्रक्रिया सुलभ करण्यासाठी व नागरिकांना सक्षम करण्यासाठी स्वघोषणा व प्रतिज्ञापत्र सुविधा सुरू करण्याचा प्रस्ताव सादर करीत आहे.

प्रस्तावातील मुख्य बाबी:

१. पात्रता: १८ वर्षे व त्यापुढील वयाच्या व्यक्तींना लागू.
२. स्टॅम्प पेपरवर प्रतिज्ञापत्र:

• वय १८ ते २५ वर्षे: ₹२०० स्टॅम्प पेपर.
• वय २५ ते ३५ वर्षे: ₹५०० स्टॅम्प पेपर.
• वय ३५ वर्षे व त्यापुढे: ₹१००० स्टॅम्प पेपर.
  ३. उद्देश:
• अधिकाऱ्यांच्या स्वाक्षरीशिवाय नागरिकांना स्वतःची माहिती प्रमाणित करण्याची सुविधा.
• प्रशासनिक भार कमी करणे व कार्यक्षमता वाढवणे.
  ४. कायदेशीर वैधता:
• प्रतिज्ञापत्र कायदेशीर बंधनकारक असेल व खोटी माहिती दिल्यास दंडनीय असेल.

ही योजना पारदर्शकता वाढवेल, भ्रष्टाचार कमी करेल व नागरिक व शासन दोघांचा वेळ वाचवेल.

आपल्या कृपादृष्टीसाठी विनम्र विनंती.

आपला,
श्री विनय दडमल

 

Family Bonding Scheme For India Vinay Dadmal Way

 

To

The Hon’ble Finance Minister,
Ministry of Finance, Government of India,
New Delhi – 110001

Subject: Proposal for Promoting Family Bonding through Salary Sharing Scheme in Union Budget 2026

Respected Madam/Sir,

I, Vinay Dadmal, resident of 55 First Floor, Swarajnagar, Behind Omkarnagar, Manewada Ring Road, Nagpur – 440027, humbly submit the following proposal for your kind consideration in the upcoming Union Budget 2026.

India has long been celebrated for its strong family values and deep-rooted traditions of mutual support and emotional bonding within households. In the spirit of reinforcing these values and promoting financial transparency and shared responsibility between spouses, I propose the introduction of a “Family Salary Sharing Scheme” under the budgetary framework.

Proposal Summary:

• Objective: To strengthen family bonding and financial cooperation between spouses.
• Mechanism:
• 10% of the monthly salary of every male government and non-government employee to be automatically deposited into his wife’s bank account.
• Similarly, 10% of the monthly salary of every female government and non-government employee to be automatically deposited into her husband’s bank account.
• Scope:
• Applicable to all salaried individuals in India, both in the public and private sectors.
• Participation may be voluntary initially, with incentives for early adopters, and can be reviewed for broader implementation based on impact assessment.
• Benefits:
• Encourages financial transparency and trust between spouses.
• Promotes joint financial planning and shared responsibility.
• Strengthens the social fabric by reinforcing traditional family values.
• Empowers non-working spouses with financial inclusion and independence.

Implementation Suggestions:

• Integration with existing payroll systems and Aadhaar-linked bank accounts.
• Tax incentives or rebates for participating couples.
• Periodic review and feedback mechanisms to assess social and economic impact.

I sincerely believe that this initiative will contribute positively to the socio-economic development of our nation by fostering stronger family units and promoting inclusive financial practices.

I request your kind consideration and support in including this proposal in the Union Budget 2026.

Place: Nagpur
Date: 07.11.2025