Though this time the timing and views expressed by our Ex –Prime Minister Shri Manmohan Singh visited suffered customers of PMC bank in Mumbai .I totally admire his observations as INC leader.He no doubt is an outstanding intelligent person.
Manmohan
Singh signals a Congress shift on Article 370 and Veer Savarkar
With Maharashtra and Haryana voting for new assemblies in four
days, former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh Thursday nuanced the Congress
position on the removal of J&K’s special status, saying the party believes
that Article 370 was a “temporary measure” under the Constitution. This is the
first time a Congress leader of Singh’s stature has articulated such a view.
Underlining that the “party had voted in favour of the dilution
of Article 370 in Parliament”, Singh told reporters in Mumbai that the Congress
was “opposed to the high-handed manner” in which it was done.
He also balanced the aggressive Congress view on Vinayak Damodar
Savarkar — days after his party had slammed the Maharashtra BJP for pledging in
its manifesto a Bharat Ratna for Savarkar — saying it was not against him.
While he skirted the Bharat Ratna issue, saying it will be
settled by the government when it comes before the committee which looks into
these matters, Singh said: “As far as Savarkarji is concerned, you would recall
that Indiraji had issued a postal stamp commemorating Savarkarji. So we are not
against Savarkarji… we are not in favour of the Hindutva ideology that
Savarkarji patronised and stood for. As far as the case of (the Bharat Ratna)
being referred to the government… the issue will be settled by the government
when his case comes before the committee which looks into these matters,” he
said.
He targeted the government over the Citizenship Amendment Bill:
“The BJP government is trying a Citizenship Amendment Bill to ensure that
Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Christians can enter our country if they are persecuted
or harassed… we are having a legislation in Parliament which discriminates
against Muslims.
This is for the first time that a national legislation is going
to discriminate on the basis of religion.” On NRC, he said: “I am not against
the legislation for NRC but it most not lose sight of the human problems that
arise in the process of investigating and finding effective means to ensure
that only people who deserve to be excluded are excluded.”
On Article 370, the Congress has been a divided house. A large
section within the Congress has been questioning the party’s opposition to the
move. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, on the other hand, has made abrogation of
Article 370 his main campaign theme in the assembly elections. Campaigning in
Haryana and Maharashtra, Modi has been attacking the Congress over its stance
on Article 370, even daring it to declare that it will bring back the provision
in its manifesto.
Sources in the Congress said Singh’s nuancing of the Congress’s
position on both Article 370 and Savarkar was strategic. “There is sentiment in
Maharashtra in favour of Savarkar… we have to admit that,” a senior party
leader said. On Article 370, Singh’s articulation more or less now reflects the
position taken by several Congress leaders like Lok Sabha MP Shashi Tharoor.
“Congress party… jab yeh Bill Parliament ke saamne aaya toh
Article 370 ki upar jo baatcheet hui, Congress party ne iske haq main vote
diya, iske khilaf vote nahin diya. Congress party ka yeh vichar hai ki Article
370 is a temporary measure. But if it has to be changed… the change has to be
brought with the goodwill of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. The manner in
which it was implemented, the high-handedness with which it was implemented is
what we opposed. We were not opposed to the enactment of Article 370’s
abrogation,” Singh said.
While the statutory resolution to amend Article 370 was passed
by a voice vote in Rajya Sabha on August 5 with little opposition, there was
division in Lok Sabha the next day and the Congress had voted against the
resolution — contrary to what Singh said.
On August 6, the Congress Working Committee met to discuss the
issue. The resolution adopted by the CWC did not mention that Article 370 was a
temporary measure. But there was some nuancing then too. The CWC did not
question the government move but slammed the “unilateral, brazen and totally
undemocratic manner” in which it was done. “It deserved to be honoured until it
was amended, after consultation with all sections of the people, and strictly
in accordance with the Constitution of India,” the CWC said.
Several leaders, including Janardan Dwivedi, Jyotiraditya
Scindia and Deepender Hooda, had publicly backed the government move. In an
interview to The Indian Express in September, Tharoor said the Congress was not
defending Article 370 “for all time” because it was “never intended to be
forever” but was questioning the manner in which the special status was revoked
as it was “undoubtedly violative of the spirit” of the Constitution.
Singh also said he was not against a legislation for NRC but it
must not lose sight of the human problems that arise: “The problem is that we
do not like foreigners to come and take the jobs that our people face. Or
therefore, foreigners or some entity who are not to the liking of many of us.
But it is a human problem. If you find people who have come and they do not
have the requisite documents, one has to look at that problem sympathetically.
Because even many people in my family… we are an educated family, if you ask us
to produce documents for proving our citizenship, I think many of them, even
educated people, would find it a problem… I think it is necessary to ensure
that any action that is taken in this regard takes into account the human
problem… in dealing with this investigation, we should not create problems for
the poorest people regardless of whether they are foreigners or they are not
foreigners.”
“In Assam, 19 lakh people have been declared foreigners. Now the
BJP had said that they would all be Muslims. Instead it turns that out of these
19 lakh, 12 lakh people are Bengali Hindus… I am not against the legislation
for NRC, but it most not lose sight of the human problems that arise in the
process of investigating and finding effective means to ensure that only the
people who deserve to be excluded are excluded,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment