Judiciary reform in India Vinay Dadmal way

Judiciary In India Vinay Dadmal way

It is observed that lot many cases are pending in the courts and tribunals.We must follow following procedural reform in judiciary  so that the cases can be solved quickly.

1.The civil courts are admitting number of cases where they can not deliver a judgement because the nature of the petition is of administrative nature where fixed rules formed by the government are used.For example a student filed a case for relaxation of marks for to get admission in the engineering stream.Here the state administration fixed the minimum % for admission.The high court later admitted its inability to relax the % for admission .In such cases the petitioners must be directed to the administration and court should not admit such cases.The registrars of the courts must direct the petitioners properly.

2.Before admitting any case a notice that a particular type of case is to be registered in court must be issued to the opposite party and a minimum 30 days period will be the waiting period.If no reply or unsatisfactory reply is received then the party may file the case in the court.Courts should keep away from directly admitting the petitions.

3.The central administrative tribunals were formed to get orders within 6 months but the cases are on an average taking  more than 1 year time to deliver a judgement.At present the grievance mechanism in the central government is at its best and hence the CAT should be stopped from functioning any further.If need arises then the Online CAT the functioning like National Human Rights Commission will be formed to work online from single place without oral hearing .